Affidavit vs statements: $1,100/mo claimed, $400 actual recurring
Verified against source
Source: Statement, Jul '25, p.3
Claimed $1,100/mo pet expenses. $400 actual recurring. One-off purchase converted to monthly.
SLAY AI for Law Firms
Lawyers apply the law. Clients bring the leverage.
SLAY AI turns your clients' scattered documentation into organized, court-ready case intelligence, before it ever reaches your desk. Built on 25 years of trial-lawyer experience.
Closed, attorney-provisioned architecture · Client data never trains public models · Patent-pending technology
Built by a 25-year trial attorney
U.S. News Best Lawyers honoree
Patent-pending technology
Closed, attorney-provisioned architecture
As featured in
The problem
Your client shows up with a shoebox of texts, screenshots, and bank statements.
The evidence is usually there. It is buried across emails, texts, PDFs, screenshots, financial records, discovery responses and client notes. Your team spends hours reconstructing what happened before it can begin analyzing what matters.
The challenge isn't the volume of information. It's turning it into a structured case before your next deadline.
Today, without SLAY AI
With SLAY AI
Client arrives in crisis, disorganized, emotionally flooded.
Client gets portal access and uploads documents and communications on their own time.
Paralegal spends hours or days organizing and labeling.
SLAY AI auto-builds a chronological evidence timeline, tagged and searchable.
Context still lives in the client's head; things get missed.
Pattern analysis flags leverage points and gaps, mapped to the legal elements of the case.
Client questions a $15,000 bill with nothing filed yet.
Less admin on the bill, fewer disputes, better client relationships.
You build timelines on a Saturday because there's no time in the week.
You spend the meeting on strategy, not extraction.
The CASE Leverage Method™
From shoebox to court-ready.
Watch the client's scattered record land in the matter and become a tagged, searchable evidence timeline. This is the product at work, on the sample matter Reyes v. Reyes.
C · CAPTURE
Bring the matter into one organized workspace.
Incidents, communications, documents, financial information and screenshots, with the factual record building as they arrive.
A · ANALYZE
See what people miss when the record gets too large.
Recurring patterns, inconsistencies, contradictions, gaps and connections across the matter, surfaced for attorney review.
S · STRUCTURE
Turn information into usable work product.
Chronologies, summaries, evidence frameworks and attorney agendas that make the case easier to understand, evaluate and present.
E · EXECUTE
Prepare with command of the facts.
Use the structured record to prepare for depositions, discovery, mediation, settlement negotiations, hearings and trial.
Matter · Reyes v. Reyes
Leverage: Strong
Evidence timeline
214 items
34 uploaded by client this week
Leverage score
78 · Strong +12
since disclosure review
Discovery gaps
3 open
brokerage statements missing
| Matter | Stage | Leverage | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reyes v. Reyes | Discovery | Strong | Serve leverage memo |
| In re Calloway | Mediation prep | Building | Draft settlement range |
| Tran v. Ellison | Pre-filing | Neutral | Request disclosures |
Attorney agenda · auto-generated
01Review 3 flagged discovery gaps before Thursday's hearing
02Pattern alert: custody timeline shifts between Ex. 12 and Ex. 31
03Client logged 2 new incidents. Timeline updated overnight.
The evidence timeline
A tagged, searchable evidence timeline builds itself.
Texts, screenshots, bank statements, parenting-app exports. Clients upload and log incidents on their own time, and every item lands in the matter sourced, dated, and mapped to the legal elements of the case.
- 612 messages parsed from one parenting-app export, source data intact
- Pattern and gap detection flags what is missing, not just what arrived
- Every entry cites the document behind it
Evidence TimelineChronological, tagged, and building as material arrives.
214 items · 9 incidents · 612 messagesLive
AUG 25
Incident: late pickup, no car seatphoto · joins 9-event exchange patternIncidents
Incident: late pickup, no car seatphoto · joins 9-event exchange patternIncidentsAUG 22
screenshots_bundle.zip: 9 items taggedexchanges, tone · every image datedCustody
screenshots_bundle.zip: 9 items taggedexchanges, tone · every image datedCustodyAUG 20
OFW export: 612 messages parsedtagged: custody, exchanges, toneCustody
OFW export: 612 messages parsedtagged: custody, exchanges, toneCustodyAUG 18
Bank statements x14 reconciledtagged: financial, mandatory disclosureFinancial
Bank statements x14 reconciledtagged: financial, mandatory disclosureFinancialAUG 16
Financial affidavit cross-checked against statements3 discrepancies flagged · sources citedFinancial
Financial affidavit cross-checked against statements3 discrepancies flagged · sources citedFinancialAUG 14Gap flagged: brokerage statements missingdiscovery follow-up suggestedGap
AUG 12
Returned without prescribed medicationphoto attached · added to patternIncidents
Returned without prescribed medicationphoto attached · added to patternIncidentsJUL 30
14 texts after 11 pm demanding schedule changeOFW export linked · tone flaggedCustody
14 texts after 11 pm demanding schedule changeOFW export linked · tone flaggedCustody
The leverage report
Patterns mapped to legal elements, not summaries.
Pattern and gap detection surfaces inconsistencies, deception, and missing discovery. Verify a financial affidavit against the statements behind it, with the source document cited every time.
- Your team walks into every hearing, mediation, or negotiation with a documented position, not a shoebox
- Every finding carries its sources, ready for attorney review
Generate LeveragePattern and gap analysis · Reyes v. Reyes
12 leverage points
Transfers over $500 traced. One undisclosed account surfaced.
Disclosure completeness1 account missing
Affidavit vs statements3 discrepancies
Disclosure & drafting
The checklist fills itself. The motions draft themselves.
Mandatory disclosure tracked against the rule, modeled on Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.285. What's missing becomes a flagged gap, and the paralegal's drafting queue fills with motions that cite the record. The lawyer is always the last supervisor.
- 8 of 11 items received, 3 gaps flagged for follow-up
- Every draft cites all of its missing items, sources linked
Disclosure & DraftingMandatory disclosure checklist · sample matter
8 of 11 received · 3 gapsParalegal queue
Documentation checklist
Financial affidavitReceived
Tax returns · 3 yearsReceived
Pay stubs · 3 monthsReceived
Bank statements x14Received
Credit card statements · 3 monthsReceived
Retirement statementsReceived
Loan applications · 12 monthsReceived
Deeds & vehicle titlesReceived
Brokerage statements · 12 monthsMissing
Corporate returns & K-1sMissing
Crypto exchange recordsMissing
Drafting for the paralegal
Motion to Compel Mandatory Disclosurecites all 3 missing items · sources linkedReady for review
Request for Production: brokerage & crypto recordsscoped to the 3 gapsReady for review
Subpoena duces tecum: brokerage custodianaccount surfaced by transfer tracingReady for review
Proposed Order granting Motion to Compelready for Thursday's hearingReady for review
Drafted from the record, every citation linked. The lawyer is always the last supervisor.
Built for litigation
Stop searching through the file. Start seeing the case.
Master chronology
Transform fragmented information into a structured chronology that shows what happened, when it happened and what supports it.
Pattern and contradiction analysis
Surface inconsistencies, recurring conduct, competing narratives and the facts that deserve closer attorney review.
Leverage position analysis
See where the matter is strong, where it is vulnerable, and where more evidence or investigation could strengthen your position.
Attorney preparation
Focused agendas, factual summaries and strategic issue lists for client meetings, depositions, negotiations, mediation and hearings.
Mediation and conference preparation
Documents, communications, incidents and supporting materials in one organized evidentiary record the whole team works from.
Strategic work product for court
Move from raw information to structured drafts and analytical work product, with attorney judgment in control.
Outcomes
You don't need another tool. You need your Saturdays back.
Real outcomes from one practice:
Beachfront Family Law, Florida.
600
pages of parenting-app messages, analyzed in minutes, source data intact
9 hrs
of weekend hearing prep, off the attorney's desk
10 min
for what used to be a 45-minute client conversation
1
undisclosed account surfaced by tracing transfers over $500
"Everyone gets tired on page 600. The AI doesn't. It finds the needle in the haystack, and that's indispensable to me now."
Lindsey Gardner Shneyder, Esq.
Florida family law attorney · 20+ years
"Literally within minutes I have a complete analysis of what could be 600 pieces of paper, with the source data. If I want to look at something specifically, I can jump straight to it."
Lindsey Gardner Shneyder, Esq.
Founder & Managing Attorney, Beachfront Family Law
"It's not replacing my experience. It's allowing me to multiply it exponentially. It's making us better lawyers, and we're going to have happier clients."
Lindsey Gardner Shneyder, Esq.
Supreme Court certified mediator & parenting coordinator
"Our firm is using SLAY AI to organize and analyze discovery. It has transformed the way we approach document-heavy matters."
Robin I. Bresky, Esq.
Managing Partner, SSRGA, Boca Raton, Florida
"It also frees our paralegals from spending hours on tedious organizational work that ultimately might need to be written off on billing."
Robin I. Bresky, Esq.
Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP
"SLAY AI doesn't replace our legal team. It makes our team more efficient, more thorough, and better prepared."
Robin I. Bresky, Esq.
Complex and high-conflict litigation
Lindsey Gardner Shneyder uses SLAY AI in her own family law practice. She is also an advisor to SLAY AI.
Built for the Bar, not around it
We answer the privilege question before you ask it.
We never tell you a document is privileged: that's a fact-specific call a judge makes after the fact, and any platform promising otherwise is the one to walk away from. What we can show you is architecture built to satisfy the factors courts actually look at: prepared at counsel's direction, in anticipation of litigation, inside a confidential environment.
Patent-pending technologySecurity overview for your IT lead
Never trains public models
A closed platform: client confidential information is never used to train public models, the exact risk Bar guidance flags with consumer AI.
You control the account
Attorney-provisioned from day one. You decide who touches what, and everything stays inside your matter.
Clients see exactly two things
Document upload and incident logging. They never touch the analysis, the timelines, or the strategy output.
Documentation before commitment
Full technical documentation for your IT or security lead, before you commit to anything.
How firms get started
Start with a pilot, not a commitment.
Most firms start SLAY AI with a short pilot on two or three active matters, so you have something concrete before rolling it out further. On a 30-minute consultation, we'll walk through the economics for your firm's size and matter volume.
Per active matter
Pricing scales with live matters, not seats. No per-user licenses, no firm-wide minimums.
No volume markup
What you pay is what your firm passes through, at cost, the way you'd bill a copy charge or a filing fee.
2-3 matters, ~90 days
Real outcome data from your own cases before you decide anything. Sized to your firm on the call.
Prefer to start on your own? SLAY AI Legal Professional is $97 per active matter per month. No long-term contracts, and you can cancel anytime.
Questions lawyers actually ask.
How is SLAY AI different from ChatGPT or other AI tools?
SLAY AI is purpose-built for high-conflict litigation and trained on 25 years of trial-lawyer methodology. It maps patterns to legal elements, not generic summarization, inside a closed, attorney-provisioned platform, not a consumer AI tool. Client information is never used to train public models.
Is client data secure and privilege-protected?
We're built to satisfy the factors courts look at for work-product protection: direction, anticipation of litigation, confidentiality. No platform can guarantee an outcome a judge hasn't ruled on. What we can guarantee is the architecture: closed, attorney-provisioned, built around your case file instead of a chat window. Full documentation available on request.
Does this replace my judgment as the attorney?
No. The lawyer is always the last supervisor. SLAY AI multiplies your team's output; you remain in control of every decision.
Will my clients actually use the portal?
Onboarding support is included, and most firms see adoption climb once clients realize it's faster than texting their lawyer. Structured implementation support is available for firms that want it built into their intake process from day one.
What does a pilot look like?
Typically two to three active matters over about 90 days, so you have real outcome data before deciding whether to roll out further. We'll size this to your firm on the call.
Does SLAY AI integrate with our practice management software?
Not yet: it's on our roadmap. Today, everything goes into the platform directly, and most firms find that works because the matter file ends up in one place either way.
Can we edit and export what SLAY AI produces?
Yes. Edit documents directly in the platform, keep files and incidents organized in one secure dashboard, and export your work for courts, mediators and co-counsel. You decide which team members and clients can view files or contribute.
Do we need technical skills to use it?
No. If your team can email, text or take a screenshot, they can use SLAY AI. It is built for clarity, not complexity.
Is there a long-term contract?
No. There are no long-term contracts, and you can cancel anytime if SLAY AI is not the right fit for your firm.
About the founder
Built by the lawyer who needed it first.
Rebecca Zung is a 25-year family law trial attorney, USA Today bestselling author, and recognized by U.S. News & World Report as one of the Best Lawyers in America. She built SLAY AI because every high-conflict matter she tried started the same way: a client in crisis, a shoebox of unorganized proof, and a team losing a weekend to make sense of it.
"Fairness is a farce. You get results because you have more leverage than the other side. SLAY AI puts that leverage in your clients' hands before they ever reach your office."
Rebecca Zung, Esq., Founder & CEO
As featured in TIME · Newsweek · Forbes · NPR
Firm consultation
Schedule your firm consultation.
Thirty minutes with a Firm Counsel Advisor. We review how your firm handles intake and evidence today, walk through SLAY AI on a matter like yours, and scope a pilot on two or three live matters. Choose a time below.
Attend and receive The Lawyer's AI Protocol, complimentary.
Your confirmation and calendar invite arrive by email within a minute.
Can't find a time? Leave your details instead.
A person, not a sequence, replies within one business day.
Could not send. Check your connection and try again.
Request received.
You'll hear from a person, not a sequence, within one business day.